关于美国是否应该配枪支的问题 英文辩论 正反方都要 注意：是英文哦 最近时事经常讲的英文的正反方辩论 因为我要写topic

关于美国是否应该配枪支的问题 英文辩论 正反方都要 注意：是英文哦 最近时事经常讲的英文的正反方辩论 因为我要写topic
关于美国是否应该配枪支的问题 英文辩论 正反方都要 注意：是英文哦 最近时事经常讲的
英文的正反方辩论 因为我要写topic

关于美国是否应该配枪支的问题 英文辩论 正反方都要 注意：是英文哦 最近时事经常讲的英文的正反方辩论 因为我要写topic
我最近在学校做了一次英文辩论,刚好就是这个题目,可惜我是反方,所以没有正方辩论.下面是我的大概的逻辑走向.我从三个方向,社会（sociologically),法律（legally),和人性（ethically)做的辩论.
Sociologically, greater gun control does not necessarily lead to less violence. Whether or not gun control works remains a question. Some people just assume that criminals, whose very intent is to break the law, would be stopped by mere restrictions set by the government. Statstically speaking, countries with stricter gun control do not benefit from less crime rates (like England).
Legally, the 2nd Amendment clearly states the individual citizen's right to bear arms. "the right to bear arms shall not be infringed" is a very clear and consicse statement, and its meaning is self-explanatory. Recent Supreme Court cases also upheld the 2nd Amendment and applied it to state governments.
Ethically, a law-abiding citizen's ability to own a gun can save lives. He/she can use it for self-defense as well as in emergency situations (like during a mass-shooting event). Criminals would also be intimidated at the thought that the owner of the house he breaks into may have a shotgun up and ready, and in turn give up the thought of commiting crimes altogether.
希望能够帮助你.

人家1791年的宪法修正案里已经板上钉钉的事，从来没想过要改，中国人到两百多年后还来讨论，真是吃饱了撑的。
Amendment II [Right to Bear Arms (1791)] A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people t...

全部展开

人家1791年的宪法修正案里已经板上钉钉的事，从来没想过要改，中国人到两百多年后还来讨论，真是吃饱了撑的。
Amendment II [Right to Bear Arms (1791)] A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

有这个闲工夫，你们怎么不去讨论下第一修正案？
Amendment I [Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, Petition (1791)] Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

收起