作业帮分析两个句子.又劳烦您帮忙了为了能更好理解句子,打出短文I am writing to say that I am against building a new zoo in our town.Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.I've visited a lot of zoos in my life,and I have never s
来源：学生作业帮助网 编辑：作业帮 时间：2024/05/14 19:49:05
分析两个句子.又劳烦您帮忙了为了能更好理解句子,打出短文I am writing to say that I am against building a new zoo in our town.Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.I've visited a lot of zoos in my life,and I have never s
分析两个句子.
又劳烦您帮忙了
为了能更好理解句子,打出短文
I am writing to say that I am against building a new zoo in our town.Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.I've visited a lot of zoos in my life,and I have never seen one I liked or one that was suitable for animals to live in.Just last week,I visited a zoo and couldn't believe what I saw.The animals are kept in tiny cages and can hardly move at all.And they are only given once a day.Is this a good way for animals to live?I don't think so.
本文第二句,第三句的末尾都有live出现,但是前者后无介词,后者有介词,对于这个问题目前有两种看法：
1.词义不同：前者表示生活所以根本无需介词,后者表示居住自然存在介词
2.前者原本有介词,但由于之前有"place"的特殊性,后面的不定式后的介词省略了
究竟哪个正确啊
分析两个句子.又劳烦您帮忙了为了能更好理解句子,打出短文I am writing to say that I am against building a new zoo in our town.Zoos are terrible places for animals to live.I've visited a lot of zoos in my life,and I have never s
第二种说法是对的.A place to live (in)是英语里的固定说法,后面加不加in意思完全一样.实际上省略的是in which,即a place (in which) to live,加in的话的话那么省略的只是which.第二句的places是表语,第三句的从句引导词that是主语,都不能当in的宾语,所以有个被省略的代词which当in的宾语是显然的.live在两句里的意思是完全一样的.
第二个是绝对正确的。place这个词很特殊，可以加in等介词，也可以不加。我经常在林语堂先生的《京华烟云》中看到place加in。现代英语中不加in的也多。都是正确的。
把分给了jiechunkay吧，那是高级人才，我教书的，这几天就教这个呢，知道是那么个意思，但解释的不够清晰明了，太有才了。另sarspatient也不错，都是厉害人物，我只知道林语堂，《京华烟云》，不晓得里边还有英语。此人绝对是英语大师。而前者应该是老师吧。...
全部展开
把分给了jiechunkay吧，那是高级人才，我教书的，这几天就教这个呢，知道是那么个意思，但解释的不够清晰明了，太有才了。另sarspatient也不错，都是厉害人物，我只知道林语堂，《京华烟云》，不晓得里边还有英语。此人绝对是英语大师。而前者应该是老师吧。
收起